Walter Chatton
Encyclopedia
Walter Chatton was an English
Scholastic
theologian and philosopher who regularly sparred philosophically with William of Ockham
, well known for Ockham's Razor.
Chatton proposed an "anti-razor". From his Lectura I d. 3, q. 1, a. 1:
In basic terms, he was arguing against Ockham's Razor by stating that if an explanation does not satisfactorily determine the truth of a proposition, and you are sure that the explanation so far is true, some other explanation must be required.
English people
The English are a nation and ethnic group native to England, who speak English. The English identity is of early mediaeval origin, when they were known in Old English as the Anglecynn. England is now a country of the United Kingdom, and the majority of English people in England are British Citizens...
Scholastic
Scholasticism
Scholasticism is a method of critical thought which dominated teaching by the academics of medieval universities in Europe from about 1100–1500, and a program of employing that method in articulating and defending orthodoxy in an increasingly pluralistic context...
theologian and philosopher who regularly sparred philosophically with William of Ockham
William of Ockham
William of Ockham was an English Franciscan friar and scholastic philosopher, who is believed to have been born in Ockham, a small village in Surrey. He is considered to be one of the major figures of medieval thought and was at the centre of the major intellectual and political controversies of...
, well known for Ockham's Razor.
Chatton proposed an "anti-razor". From his Lectura I d. 3, q. 1, a. 1:
Whenever an affirmative proposition is apt to be verified for actually existing things, if two things, howsoever they are present according to arrangement and duration, cannot suffice for the verification of the proposition while another thing is lacking, then one must posit that other thing.
In basic terms, he was arguing against Ockham's Razor by stating that if an explanation does not satisfactorily determine the truth of a proposition, and you are sure that the explanation so far is true, some other explanation must be required.