![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images//topicimages/noimage.gif)
Maximal function
Encyclopedia
Maximal functions appear in many forms in harmonic analysis
(an area of mathematics
). One of the most important of these is the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function. They play an important role in understanding, for example, the differentiability properties of functions, singular integrals and partial differential equations. They often provide a deeper and more simplified approach to understanding problems in these areas than other methods.
in the language of cricket
averages. Given a function
defined on
the uncentred Hardy–Littlewood maximal function
of
is defined as
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-5.gif)
at each
. Here, the supremum is taken over balls
in
which contain the point
and
denotes the measure
of
(in this case a multiple of the radius of the ball raised to the power
). One can also study the centred maximal function, where the supremum is taken just over balls
which have centre
. In practice there is little difference between the two.
(a) For
(
),
is finite almost everywhere.
(b) If
, then there exists a
such that, for all
,
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-21.gif)
(c) If
(
), then
and
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-25.gif)
where
depends only on
and
.
Properties (b) is called a weak-type bound of M(f). For an integrable function, it corresponds to the elementary Markov inequality; however, M(f) is never integrable, unless f is zero a.e., so that the proof of the weak bound (b) for M(f) requires a less elementary argument from geometric measure theory, such as the Vitali covering lemma
. Property (c) says the operator
is bounded on
; it is clearly true when
, since we cannot take an average of a bounded function and obtain a value larger than the largest value of the function. Property (c) for all other values of
can then be deduced from these two facts by an interpolation argument.
It is worth noting (c) does not hold for
. This can be easily proved by calculating
, where
is the characteristic function of the unit ball centred at the origin.
and Fatou's theorem
and in the theory of singular integral operators.
defined on the upper-half plane
and produces a function
defined on
via the expression
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-40.gif)
Obverse that for a fixed
, the set
is a cone in
with vertex at
and axis perpendicular to the boundary of
. Thus, the non-tangential maximal operator simply takes the supremum of the function
over a cone with vertex at the boundary of
.
in which study of the non-tangential maximal function is important is formed from an approximation to the identity
. That is, we fix an integrable smooth function
on
such that
and set![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-52.gif)
for
. Then define
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-54.gif)
One can show that
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-55.gif)
and consequently obtain that
converges to
in
for all
. Such a result can be used to show that the harmonic extension of an
function to the upper-half plane converges non-tangentially to that function. More general results can be obtained where the Laplacian is replaced by an elliptic operator via similar techniques.
on
, the sharp maximal function
is defined as
for each
, where the supremum is taken over all balls
.
The sharp function can be used to obtain a point-wise inequality regarding singular integrals. Suppose we have an operator
which is bounded on
, so we have
for all smooth and compactly supported
. Suppose also that we can realise
as convolution against a kernel
in the sense that, whenever
and
are smooth and have disjoint support
Finally we assume a size and smoothness condition on the kernel
:
when
. Then for a fixed
, we have
for all
.
be a probability space, and
a measure-preserving endomorphism of
. The maximal function of a function
is![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-86.gif)
The maximal function of f verifies a weak bound analogous to the Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality:![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-87.gif)
that is a restatement of the maximal ergodic theorem.
Harmonic analysis
Harmonic analysis is the branch of mathematics that studies the representation of functions or signals as the superposition of basic waves. It investigates and generalizes the notions of Fourier series and Fourier transforms...
(an area of mathematics
Mathematics
Mathematics is the study of quantity, space, structure, and change. Mathematicians seek out patterns and formulate new conjectures. Mathematicians resolve the truth or falsity of conjectures by mathematical proofs, which are arguments sufficient to convince other mathematicians of their validity...
). One of the most important of these is the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function. They play an important role in understanding, for example, the differentiability properties of functions, singular integrals and partial differential equations. They often provide a deeper and more simplified approach to understanding problems in these areas than other methods.
The Hardy–Littlewood maximal function
In their original paper, G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood explained their maximal inequalityin the language of cricket
Cricket
Cricket is a bat-and-ball game played between two teams of 11 players on an oval-shaped field, at the centre of which is a rectangular 22-yard long pitch. One team bats, trying to score as many runs as possible while the other team bowls and fields, trying to dismiss the batsmen and thus limit the...
averages. Given a function
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-1.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-2.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-3.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-4.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-5.gif)
at each
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-6.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-7.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-8.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-9.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-10.gif)
Measure (mathematics)
In mathematical analysis, a measure on a set is a systematic way to assign to each suitable subset a number, intuitively interpreted as the size of the subset. In this sense, a measure is a generalization of the concepts of length, area, and volume...
of
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-11.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-12.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-13.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-14.gif)
Basic properties
The following statements are central to the utility of the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator.(a) For
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-15.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-16.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-17.gif)
(b) If
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-18.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-19.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-20.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-21.gif)
(c) If
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-22.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-23.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-24.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-25.gif)
where
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-26.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-27.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-28.gif)
Properties (b) is called a weak-type bound of M(f). For an integrable function, it corresponds to the elementary Markov inequality; however, M(f) is never integrable, unless f is zero a.e., so that the proof of the weak bound (b) for M(f) requires a less elementary argument from geometric measure theory, such as the Vitali covering lemma
Vitali covering lemma
In mathematics, the Vitali covering lemma is a combinatorial and geometric result commonly used in measure theory of Euclidean spaces. This lemma is an intermediate step, of independent interest, in the proof of the Vitali covering theorem. The covering theorem is credited to the Italian...
. Property (c) says the operator
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-29.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-30.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-31.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-32.gif)
It is worth noting (c) does not hold for
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-33.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-34.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-35.gif)
Applications
The Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator appears in many places but some of its most notable uses are in the proofs of the Lebesgue differentiation theoremLebesgue differentiation theorem
In mathematics, the Lebesgue differentiation theorem is a theorem of real analysis, which states that for almost every point, the value of an integrable function is the limit of infinitesimal averages taken about the point...
and Fatou's theorem
Fatou's theorem
In complex analysis, Fatou's theorem, named after Pierre Fatou, is a statement concerning holomorphic functions on the unit disk and their pointwise extension to the boundary of the disk.-Motivation and statement of theorem:...
and in the theory of singular integral operators.
Non-tangential maximal functions
The non-tangential maximal function takes a function![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-36.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-37.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-38.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-39.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-40.gif)
Obverse that for a fixed
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-41.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-42.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-43.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-44.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-45.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-46.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-47.gif)
Approximations of the identity
One particularly important form of functions![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-48.gif)
Approximation to the identity
In mathematics, an approximation to the identity refers to a sequence or net that converges to the identity in some algebra. Specifically, it can mean:* Nascent delta function, most commonly* Mollifier, more narrowly* Approximate identity, more abstractly...
. That is, we fix an integrable smooth function
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-49.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-50.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-51.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-52.gif)
for
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-53.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-54.gif)
One can show that
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-55.gif)
and consequently obtain that
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-56.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-57.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-58.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-59.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-60.gif)
The sharp maximal function
For a locally integrable function![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-61.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-62.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-63.gif)
for each
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-65.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-66.gif)
The sharp function can be used to obtain a point-wise inequality regarding singular integrals. Suppose we have an operator
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-67.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-68.gif)
for all smooth and compactly supported
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-70.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-71.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-72.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-73.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-74.gif)
Finally we assume a size and smoothness condition on the kernel
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-76.gif)
when
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-78.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-79.gif)
for all
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-81.gif)
Maximal functions in ergodic theory
Let![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-82.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-83.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-84.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-85.gif)
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-86.gif)
The maximal function of f verifies a weak bound analogous to the Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality:
![](http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/formulas/0/5/4058135-87.gif)
that is a restatement of the maximal ergodic theorem.