List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 460
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 460 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 460 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp.Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp.Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. , commonly cited as Moses Cone or Cone Hospital, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning civil procedure, specifically the abstention doctrine, as it applies to enforcing an arbitration clause in a diversity case...
, - Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn.,
- Connecticut v. Johnson,
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.,
- City of Lockhart v. United States,
- Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories,
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States,
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Constr. Employers, Inc.,
- EEOC v. Wyoming,
- United States v. KnottsUnited States v. KnottsUnited States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 was a 1983 United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of electronic surveillance devices. The device in question is described as a beeper and can only be tracked from a short distance...
, - Block v. Neal,
- North Dakota v. United States,
- Briscoe v. LaHueBriscoe v. LaHueBriscoe v. LaHue, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court held that Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 did not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial....
, - Hillsboro Nat. Bank v. Commissioner,
- Falls City Industries, Inc. v. Vanco Beverage, Inc.,
- United States v. Generix Drug Corp.,
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 , was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case...
, - Florida v. Royer,
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd., (per curiam)
- Washington v. United States,
- Illinois v. Abbott & Associates, Inc.,
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Comm'r of Revenue,
- Arizona v. CaliforniaArizona v. CaliforniaArizona v. California is a set of United States Supreme Court cases, all dealing with water distribution from the Colorado River.When a dispute arises between two states, the case is filed for original jurisdiction with the United States Supreme Court. This is one of the very limited circumstances...
, - Tuten v. United States,
- Operating Engineers v. Jones,
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. NLRB,
- Postal Service Bd. of Governors v. Aikens,
- Kush v. Rutledge,
- Texas v. Brown,
- United States v. Rylander,
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergyMetropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergyMetropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.-Facts:After the meltdown of reactor number 2 at Three Mile Island, The People Against Nuclear Energy contended that restarting reactor number 1 would cause severe psychological trauma...
, - Anderson v. CelebrezzeAnderson v. CelebrezzeAnderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States in which Ohio's filing deadline for independent candidates was determined to be unconstitutional.-Background:...
, - Bowsher v. Merck & Co.,