List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 372
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 372 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 372 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- New Jersey v. New York, S. & W. R. Co.,
- McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras,
- Incres S. S. Co. v. Maritime Workers,
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.,
- United States v. GilmoreUnited States v. GilmoreUnited States v. Gilmore was a federal income tax case before the United States Supreme Court.From the Syllabus:-Background:In the course of a hotly contested divorce, the taxpayer had incurred substantial legal fees in defending against his wife's claim to ownership of a controlling interest in...
, - United States v. Patrick,
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan,
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n,
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.,
- Schulde v. Commissioner,
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez,
- Simler v. Conner, (per curiam)
- Schneider v. RuskSchneider v. RuskSchneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 , was a United States Supreme Court case which invalidated a law that treated naturalized and native-born citizens differentially under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.-Background:...
, (per curiam) - Board of Comm'rs of Jefferson County v. City and County of Denver, (per curiam)
- Rudnicki v. Cox, (per curiam)
- King County v. F. L. Hartung Glass Co., (per curiam)
- Chupka v. Lorenz-Schneider Co., (per curiam)
- Sheldon v. Fannin, (per curiam)
- Edwards v. South CarolinaEdwards v. South CarolinaEdwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S...
, - National Motor Freight Traffic Assn., Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Harrison v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., (per curiam)
- White Stag Mfg. Co. v. Ellis, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Dallas, (per curiam)
- Bearden v. United States, (per curiam)
- White Motor Co. v. United States,
- Locomotive Engineers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., (per curiam)
- Townsend v. Sain,
- Gideon v. WainwrightGideon v. WainwrightGideon v. Wainwright, , is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants who are unable to afford their own...
, - Douglas v. CaliforniaDouglas v. CaliforniaDouglas v. California, , was a case before the United States Supreme Court.-Facts:Two defendants were tried and convicted in a California state court on felony charges including robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, and assault with intent to commit murder.A single public defender had been...
, - Gray v. SandersGray v. SandersGray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 , was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with equal representation in regard to the American election system and formulated the famous "one person, one vote" standard for legislative districting....
, - Fay v. Noia,
- Lane v. Brown,
- Draper v. Washington,
- Drivers v. Riss & Co., (per curiam)
- Cole v. Manning, (per curiam)
- Craig v. Bennett, (per curiam)
- Fields v. South Carolina, (per curiam)
- Machinists v. Electrical Workers, (per curiam)
- Birmingham Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Southern R. Co., (per curiam)
- Jefferson Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Walker v. United States, (per curiam)
- Robinson v. United States, (per curiam)
- Lynumn v. Illinois,
- Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm.,
- Bush v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Michigan Nat. Bank v. Robertson, (per curiam)
- Tar Asphalt Trucking Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Peterson v. Allen Circuit Court, (per curiam)
- Weyerhauser S. S. Co. v. United States,
- State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co., (per curiam)
- Harshman v. United States, (per curiam)
- Parker v. United States, (per curiam)
- Dugan v. Rank,
- Fresno v. California,
- Wolf v. Weinstein,
- Arrow Transp. Co. v. Southern R. Co.,
- Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.,
- Dixilyn Drilling Corp. v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co., (per curiam)
- Basham v. Pennsylvania R. Co., (per curiam)
- Lester C. Newton Trucking Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Johnson v. Mississippi, (per curiam)
- Johnson v. California, (per curiam)
- Karpel v. California, (per curiam)
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power Dist. v. Mesa, (per curiam)
- Daniels v. United StatesDaniels v. United StatesDaniels v. United States, , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984. The Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that a defendant sentenced under that act could not challenge, on appeal, previous convictions that were used to increase his...
, (per curiam) - Meyerkorth v. Nebraska, (per curiam)
- Johnson v. Dowd, (per curiam)
- Craig v. Indiana, (per curiam)
- Barber v. Virginia, (per curiam)
- Thompson v. Indiana, (per curiam)
- Holloman v. Virginia, (per curiam)
- Luckman v. Dunbar, (per curiam)
- Puntari v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Collins v. California, (per curiam)
- Fuqua v. Mississippi, (per curiam)
- Holmes v. California, (per curiam)
- Symons v. California, (per curiam)
- Tucker v. Indiana, (per curiam)
- Williams v. California, (per curiam)
- Colorado Anti-Discrimination Comm'n v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.,
- Ferguson v. SkrupaFerguson v. SkrupaFerguson v. Skrupa was a case before the United States Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of prohibiting debt adjustment.-Background:...
, - Downum v. United States,
- ICC v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.,
- Williams v. Zuckert, (per curiam)
- Rice v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Hatten v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Giles v. Maryland, (per curiam)
- Weigner v. Russell, (per curiam)
- Garner v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Vecchiolli v. Maroney, (per curiam)
- Watt v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Arnold v. Director, Florida Div. of Corrections, (per curiam)
- Haynes v. Florida, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Newport News Redevelopment & Housing Authority, (per curiam)
- Tiller v. California, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Newport News, (per curiam)
- Treadwell Constr. Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Walker v. Randolph, (per curiam)
- LaForge v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Tyler v. North Carolina, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, (per curiam)
- Lindner v. Nash, (per curiam)
- Tull v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Douglas v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Jordan v. Wiman, (per curiam)
- Doughty v. Maxwell, (per curiam)
- Hartsfield v. Wainwright, (per curiam)