List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 322
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 322 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 322 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. v. United States,
- Pollock v. Williams,
- United States v. Marshall Transport Co.,
- The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.,
- Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. Read,
- United States v. Mitchell,
- Southern R. Co. v. United StatesSouthern R. Co. v. United StatesSouthern Railway Company v. United States, 222 U.S. 20 , was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that under the Commerce Clause, the U.S. Congress can regulate safety on intrastate rail traffic because there is a close and substantial connection to interstate traffic.Congress...
, - United States v. BallardUnited States v. BallardUnited States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78 , was an appeal of the conviction of two leaders of the new religious "I AM" Activity movement for fraudulently seeking and collecting donations on the basis of religious claims that the defendants themselves did not believe...
, - United States v. American Surety Co.,
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States ex rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.,
- NLRB v. Hearst Publications, Inc.,
- Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.,
- Ashcraft v. TennesseeAshcraft v. TennesseeAshcraft v. State of Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143 , is a U.S. Supreme Court case, with a decision written by Justice Hugo Black.The defendant in the case, E.E. Ashcraft, was charged with hiring John Ware to murder Ashcraft's wife, Zelma Ida Ashcraft. Ashcraft and Ware confessed to the crimes and were...
, - United States v. County of Allegheny,
- United States v. Wabash R. Co.,
- Union Brokerage Co. v. Jensen,
- Kansas v. Missouri,
- Huddleston v. Dwyer, (per curiam)
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.,
- Shawkee Mfg. Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.,
- Douglas v. Commissioner,
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Minnesota,
- McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.,
- General Trading Co. v. State Tax Comm'n of Iowa,
- International Harvester Co. v. Department of Treasury,
- United States v. Hellard,
- Mortensen v. United States,
- Columbia Gas & Elec. Corp. v. American Fuel & Power Co., (per curiam)
- United States v. Saylor,
- Keefe v. Clark,
- L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles,
- Crites, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. Co.,
- Arenas v. United States,
- International Harvester Co. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Taxation,
- De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San Juan,
- Mercado E Hijos v. Commins,
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.,
- Feldman v. United States,
- ICC v. Jersey City,
- Wisconsin Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States,
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters AssociationUnited States v. South-Eastern Underwriters AssociationUnited States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 is a United States Supreme Court decision that held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States...
, - Lyons v. Oklahoma,
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.,
- Polish National Alliance of United States v. NLRB,
- Kansas v. Missouri,
- Baumgartner v. United States,
- Hartzel v. United States,
- United States v. WhiteUnited States v. WhiteUnited States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 , was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a...
,