Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States
Encyclopedia
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594
(1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in
sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act
, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.
Case citation
Case citation is the system used in many countries to identify the decisions in past court cases, either in special series of books called reporters or law reports, or in a 'neutral' form which will identify a decision wherever it was reported...
(1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in
Tie-in
A tie-in is an authorized product based on a media property a company is releasing, such as a movie or video/DVD, computer game, video game, television program/television series, board game, web site, role-playing game or literary property...
sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act
Sherman Antitrust Act
The Sherman Antitrust Act requires the United States federal government to investigate and pursue trusts, companies, and organizations suspected of violating the Act. It was the first Federal statute to limit cartels and monopolies, and today still forms the basis for most antitrust litigation by...
, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 345
- Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States (1958), a similar case
- Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. HydeJefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. HydeJefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 , was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States involving "tying arrangements" and antitrust law.-External links:*...
(1984), a case involving "tying arrangements" - United States v. Loew's Inc.United States v. Loew's Inc.United States v. Loew's Inc., 371 U.S. 38 , was an antitrust case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that block booking of movies—the offer of only a combined assortment of movies to an exhibitor—violates the Sherman Antitrust Act....
(1962), a case on product bundlingProduct bundlingProduct bundling is a marketing strategy that involves offering several products for sale as one combined product. This strategy is very common in the software business , in the cable television industry Product bundling is a marketing strategy that involves offering several products for sale as...