44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
Encyclopedia
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

 case, which declared that a law banning the advertisement of alcohol except at the place of sale as unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering...

.

Background

The company 44 Liquormart Inc. owned liquor stores in Rhode Island, which had banned the advertisement of alcoholic beverage prices in places where alcohol was not sold. The District Court found the ban unconstitutional because the state did not prove that the law directly advanced its interest in reducing alcohol consumption and because the law's reach was unnecessarily extensive. The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:* District of Maine* District of Massachusetts...

 reversed the lower court, ruling that an increase in alcohol advertisements would lead to an increase in alcohol sales and that the Twenty-first Amendment
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution repealed the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which had mandated nationwide Prohibition...

 gave the state's ban a presumption of validity.

Ruling

The court ruled that the state did not have a compelling interest in restricting alcohol advertisements and the ban violated first amendment rights of the petitioners. However, the court ruled that Article 2 of the 21st Amendment allowed the state to regulate alcohol.

See also


External links

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK