123veritatis
The topic that really gets me going is one of basic human rights. In this case, it is the right to go back to one's true origins. While wars, disease and revolutions cause devastating harm to families, communities and cultural traditions, I believe that some records do always remain of populations and their details of dispersion. For example, the U.S. Ellis Island Records are an excellent example of how roots may be traced. Nevertheless, access to these records does appear to get increasingly complicated. Many librarians and archivists do such work voluntarily and may also be under too much pressure to attend to specific and complicated requests.
Throughout history, dispersion has resulted in the obliteration of people's past, of their history and their roots. Children, as well as adults, got their names changed and grew to accept their current situation without questioning.
It feels like 'enforced amnesia'. The sorrowful situation is when individuals, often from an early age, begin to feel they do not fit in their imposed milieu. This yearning to go back to basics of one's roots can recur even after several generations. Call it 'concepts of reincarnation' or call it what one wills but my thesis is that there is a strong element of truth in this matter. Does anyone get my drift? Has it ever occurred to you that "No, I'm not a sikh, I'm a Zoroastrian!" or "No, I'm not English, I'm French" for the sake of argument.
Thus, it does bother me enormously that in the annals of history, we read that before quitting Malta, Napoleon made his last mark - had his last word. He obliged all newcomers to Malta - refugees or whatever, to destroy - yes, to burn - their documents of origin. Like that, he thought the new Nation would be born.
Nationalism, patriotism, pride in the achievements of such a Nation could become overpoweringly patronising. If the name of origin were to have been Samat from Libya or Egypt, for the sake of argument, and the adopted name, Sammut, in order to fit in with the already existing name, a curious holder of the latter version might well be bullied into oblivion in his pilgrimage to seek his roots away from his / her adopted land.
The argument is complex and wide-ranging. However, I do maintain, with humility, that there should be no embarrassment nor any bar to openly seeking that information needed - the original spelling of the name, in order to enable investigations in the archives of the alleged country of origin. It isn't just names that can nurture stress, irritation, sadness, disappointment in the pilgrim seeking the truth about himself. It could be the factor of family belief system, creed or lack of it, native tongues, and so on.
In this actual case of Malta, I am convinced that parish churches, civic lists, colonial rulers' registers must have survived and that access to original data is possible. It may be brave to say it but I regard it as quite arrogant of the Church to appear to deprive those wishing to know their root faith or ethnic group, for instance. State archives are also very unaccessible in Malta and the official list of genealogists is not only amazingly short but what there is, is quite unhelpful.
While genealogy is an ever popular topic and dedicated communities have strived to create the most wonderful archives - namely, the Archiginnasio in Bologna, Emilia Romagna and its sister archives in Palermo, I still maintain that access to the records kept in these institutions is unduly restricted to the public user. Commercial entities of some dubious credentials have also worked overtime to hijack normal, legitimate access to records through greed. They stand in the way of legitimate research holding the potential researcher to ransom for considerable money.
As tax payers and contributors to civic life in general, citizens should be a lot better enabled to research their family history without political or religious exigencies in a democratic society.
Throughout history, dispersion has resulted in the obliteration of people's past, of their history and their roots. Children, as well as adults, got their names changed and grew to accept their current situation without questioning.
It feels like 'enforced amnesia'. The sorrowful situation is when individuals, often from an early age, begin to feel they do not fit in their imposed milieu. This yearning to go back to basics of one's roots can recur even after several generations. Call it 'concepts of reincarnation' or call it what one wills but my thesis is that there is a strong element of truth in this matter. Does anyone get my drift? Has it ever occurred to you that "No, I'm not a sikh, I'm a Zoroastrian!" or "No, I'm not English, I'm French" for the sake of argument.
Thus, it does bother me enormously that in the annals of history, we read that before quitting Malta, Napoleon made his last mark - had his last word. He obliged all newcomers to Malta - refugees or whatever, to destroy - yes, to burn - their documents of origin. Like that, he thought the new Nation would be born.
Nationalism, patriotism, pride in the achievements of such a Nation could become overpoweringly patronising. If the name of origin were to have been Samat from Libya or Egypt, for the sake of argument, and the adopted name, Sammut, in order to fit in with the already existing name, a curious holder of the latter version might well be bullied into oblivion in his pilgrimage to seek his roots away from his / her adopted land.
The argument is complex and wide-ranging. However, I do maintain, with humility, that there should be no embarrassment nor any bar to openly seeking that information needed - the original spelling of the name, in order to enable investigations in the archives of the alleged country of origin. It isn't just names that can nurture stress, irritation, sadness, disappointment in the pilgrim seeking the truth about himself. It could be the factor of family belief system, creed or lack of it, native tongues, and so on.
In this actual case of Malta, I am convinced that parish churches, civic lists, colonial rulers' registers must have survived and that access to original data is possible. It may be brave to say it but I regard it as quite arrogant of the Church to appear to deprive those wishing to know their root faith or ethnic group, for instance. State archives are also very unaccessible in Malta and the official list of genealogists is not only amazingly short but what there is, is quite unhelpful.
While genealogy is an ever popular topic and dedicated communities have strived to create the most wonderful archives - namely, the Archiginnasio in Bologna, Emilia Romagna and its sister archives in Palermo, I still maintain that access to the records kept in these institutions is unduly restricted to the public user. Commercial entities of some dubious credentials have also worked overtime to hijack normal, legitimate access to records through greed. They stand in the way of legitimate research holding the potential researcher to ransom for considerable money.
As tax payers and contributors to civic life in general, citizens should be a lot better enabled to research their family history without political or religious exigencies in a democratic society.