Intelligent designist frame their arguments in secular terms. They avoid identifying the Designer because they believe their theory is scientific, not religious.

Critics such as Jerry Coyne argue that there is not enough evidence to support the existence of a Designer.

While proponents argue that the Designer does not need to be explained, critics argue that this is a cliche.

Then you think that by a religious argument; to the fact that "JESUS" is the center of the universe you would only except that if I took you there first hand.
Then when you saw him standing there would you then think that he was smart enough to create you?

There are supporters of Intelligent design who are, like myself, atheists. The attraction to the ID thesis is based on the recognition that all biological systems function and develop in such a way that shows they not only recognize their imperatives but are able to bring about the necessary adaptive responses to those imperatives. It is the organism that is perhaps the designer!

Can we separate the unmanifested from the manifested? Don't you think we must consider scientific realm itself project the right ID in an esoteric way?

Intelligent design, in all reality is not even worthy of comment. It is ill conceived, very poorly executed. Read Richard Dawkins book