Augustus1
The study of propositions and their use in argumentation.
The major task of logic is to establish a systematic way of deducing the logical consequences of a set of sentences. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary first to identify or characterize the logical consequences of a set of sentences. The procedures for deriving conclusions from a set of sentences then need to be examined to verify that all logical consequences, and only those, are deducible from that set. Finally, in recent times, the question has been raised whether all the truths regarding some domain of interest can be contained in a specifiable deductive system.
From its very beginning, the field of logic has been occupied with arguments, in which certain statements, the premises, are asserted in order to support some other statement, the conclusion. If the premises are intended to provide conclusive support for the conclusion, the argument is a deductive one. If the premises are intended to support the conclusion only to a lesser degree, the argument is called inductive. A logically correct deductive argument is termed valid, while an acceptable inductive argument is called cogent. The notion of support is further elucidated by the observation that the truth of the premises of a valid deductive argument necessitates the truth of the conclusion: it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. The truth of the premises of a cogent inductive argument, on the other hand, confers only a probability of truth on its conclusion: it is possible for the premises to be true while the conclusion is false.
Logic is not concerned to discover premises that persuade an audience to accept, or to believe, the conclusion. This is the subject of rhetoric. The notion of rational persuasion is sometimes used by logicians in the sense that, if one were to accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, it would not be rational to reject the conclusion; one would in effect be contradicting oneself in practice. The case of inductive logic will be considered below.
From the above characterization of arguments, it is evident that they are always advanced in some language, either a natural language such as English or Chinese or, possibly, a specialized technical language such as mathematics. To develop rules for determining the validity of deductive arguments, the statements comprising the argument must be analyzed in order to see how they relate to one another. The analysis of the logical forms of arguments can be accomplished most perspicuously if the statements of the argument are framed in some canonical form. Additionally, when stated in a regimented format, various ambiguities or other defects of the original statements can be avoided.
When they are stated in a natural language, some arguments appear to give support to their conclusions or to confute a thesis. Such a defective, although apparently correct, argument is called a fallacy. Some of these errors in argument occur often enough that types of such fallacies are given special names. For example, if one were to attack the premises of an argument by casting aspersions on the character of the proponent of the argument, this would be characterized as committing an ad hominem fallacy. The character of the proponent of an argument has no relevance to the validity of the argument. There are several other fallacies of relevance, such as threatening the audience (argumentum ad baculum) or appealing to their feelings of pity (argumentum ad misericordiam).Such as logic could denote that as Julius Caesar the father and his son Augustus worked on the calendar, as any inventor it is then named after them i.e. BC,AD Right full meaning Before Caesar Augustus Decssus. A legitimate title given to Augustus Caesar {son of god} for it is well known that Julius Caesar was made a god at the time of his death, also the valid father son and Holy Spirit. Thus by proving the obvious you disprove an illogic erroneous belief and uncover the unholy or untrue practise of christens worship. For it is considerably easier to prove then is to deny Augustus Caesar as the righteous Son of God and saviour of peace! From Suetonius, Life of Augustus
The whole body of citizens with a sudden unanimous impulse offered to him the title of "father of his country" - first the plebeians, and then the senate. The representative of the senate, speaking for the whole body, said: "Good fortune and divine favour attend you and your house, Caesar Augustus; for when we pray this we know that we are also praying for lasting prosperity for our country and happiness for our city. The senate in accord with the Roman people hails thee 'Father of your Country.'" Then Augustus with tears in his eyes replied as follows (and I have given his exact words): "Having attained my highest hopes, members of the senate, what more have I to ask of the immortal gods than that I may retain this same unanimous approval of yours to the very end of my life?" Coins of an emperor were issued as a symbol of respect and accomplishment Roman coins were transmitters of political propaganda. One side showed the portrait of the emperor and the other side showed a recent victory or an important event. Caesar Augustus used these coins to show people what he did and what he had accomplished. On one coin we see him wearing a wreath. Around the coin are words saying "Caesar Augustus Divi F Pater Patrie" meaning, Augustus Caesar, Son of God, and Father of the Fatherland. Some people were to illiterate. He used these coins to depict the role he played, or the things he did, in order to allow them to understand and gain respect from his people. On the other coin we see him riding an animal on the top of an arch. Around the coin we see inscriptions saying "Qoud Viae Mun Sunt" which means because the roads have been reinforced. This coin represents a military victory. The arch, also being symbolic of such an accomplishment. The coins that he issued showed that Augustus was a very political emperor. He wanted to make people aware of his accomplishments so he could get the approval and respect he deserved. The Holy star, in 1705 the English astronomer Edmond Halley published a work that included his calculations showing that comets observed in 1531, 1607, and 1682 were really one comet and predicting that comet's return in 1758. The comet was sighted late in 1758, passed perihelion in March 1759, and was named in Halley's honour. Comet sightings at intervals of about 76 years, from 63BC. Caesar Augustus Born: 23-Sep-63 before Caesar Augustus Decssus, Died: 19-Aug-14 AD. Passed by the Earth and Sun in November-December 1985 and March-April 1986.The earliest known mention of the comet in Europe occurs in Dion Cassius’s account of a number of portents at the death of Augustus Caesar which is where you get the Son of God ascending upon the throne of the God’s. His age is the same return as the comet 76 years born 63 work it out, then perverted by the cruz worshipers, “In 1682 he predicted the comet would return again in 1758, and sure enough, the comet arrived in March 1759. Halley's Comet made a particularly bright appearance in 1910.Augustus Caesar’s birth as in son of god 63, comet calculation taking his age at AD or Augustus Death age 76 away from 63, year he was born13,89,165,241,317,393,469,545,621,697,773,849,925,1001,1077,1153,1229,1305,1381,1457,1533,1609,1685,1761,1837,1913,1989 so as you can clearly see not much change or discrepancy in the dates of Edmund with the birth of the true son of god i.e. Augustus .It takes a wise man to lead the blind and the wicked to lead them away from the true guiding light.
The major task of logic is to establish a systematic way of deducing the logical consequences of a set of sentences. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary first to identify or characterize the logical consequences of a set of sentences. The procedures for deriving conclusions from a set of sentences then need to be examined to verify that all logical consequences, and only those, are deducible from that set. Finally, in recent times, the question has been raised whether all the truths regarding some domain of interest can be contained in a specifiable deductive system.
From its very beginning, the field of logic has been occupied with arguments, in which certain statements, the premises, are asserted in order to support some other statement, the conclusion. If the premises are intended to provide conclusive support for the conclusion, the argument is a deductive one. If the premises are intended to support the conclusion only to a lesser degree, the argument is called inductive. A logically correct deductive argument is termed valid, while an acceptable inductive argument is called cogent. The notion of support is further elucidated by the observation that the truth of the premises of a valid deductive argument necessitates the truth of the conclusion: it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. The truth of the premises of a cogent inductive argument, on the other hand, confers only a probability of truth on its conclusion: it is possible for the premises to be true while the conclusion is false.
Logic is not concerned to discover premises that persuade an audience to accept, or to believe, the conclusion. This is the subject of rhetoric. The notion of rational persuasion is sometimes used by logicians in the sense that, if one were to accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, it would not be rational to reject the conclusion; one would in effect be contradicting oneself in practice. The case of inductive logic will be considered below.
From the above characterization of arguments, it is evident that they are always advanced in some language, either a natural language such as English or Chinese or, possibly, a specialized technical language such as mathematics. To develop rules for determining the validity of deductive arguments, the statements comprising the argument must be analyzed in order to see how they relate to one another. The analysis of the logical forms of arguments can be accomplished most perspicuously if the statements of the argument are framed in some canonical form. Additionally, when stated in a regimented format, various ambiguities or other defects of the original statements can be avoided.
When they are stated in a natural language, some arguments appear to give support to their conclusions or to confute a thesis. Such a defective, although apparently correct, argument is called a fallacy. Some of these errors in argument occur often enough that types of such fallacies are given special names. For example, if one were to attack the premises of an argument by casting aspersions on the character of the proponent of the argument, this would be characterized as committing an ad hominem fallacy. The character of the proponent of an argument has no relevance to the validity of the argument. There are several other fallacies of relevance, such as threatening the audience (argumentum ad baculum) or appealing to their feelings of pity (argumentum ad misericordiam).Such as logic could denote that as Julius Caesar the father and his son Augustus worked on the calendar, as any inventor it is then named after them i.e. BC,AD Right full meaning Before Caesar Augustus Decssus. A legitimate title given to Augustus Caesar {son of god} for it is well known that Julius Caesar was made a god at the time of his death, also the valid father son and Holy Spirit. Thus by proving the obvious you disprove an illogic erroneous belief and uncover the unholy or untrue practise of christens worship. For it is considerably easier to prove then is to deny Augustus Caesar as the righteous Son of God and saviour of peace! From Suetonius, Life of Augustus
The whole body of citizens with a sudden unanimous impulse offered to him the title of "father of his country" - first the plebeians, and then the senate. The representative of the senate, speaking for the whole body, said: "Good fortune and divine favour attend you and your house, Caesar Augustus; for when we pray this we know that we are also praying for lasting prosperity for our country and happiness for our city. The senate in accord with the Roman people hails thee 'Father of your Country.'" Then Augustus with tears in his eyes replied as follows (and I have given his exact words): "Having attained my highest hopes, members of the senate, what more have I to ask of the immortal gods than that I may retain this same unanimous approval of yours to the very end of my life?" Coins of an emperor were issued as a symbol of respect and accomplishment Roman coins were transmitters of political propaganda. One side showed the portrait of the emperor and the other side showed a recent victory or an important event. Caesar Augustus used these coins to show people what he did and what he had accomplished. On one coin we see him wearing a wreath. Around the coin are words saying "Caesar Augustus Divi F Pater Patrie" meaning, Augustus Caesar, Son of God, and Father of the Fatherland. Some people were to illiterate. He used these coins to depict the role he played, or the things he did, in order to allow them to understand and gain respect from his people. On the other coin we see him riding an animal on the top of an arch. Around the coin we see inscriptions saying "Qoud Viae Mun Sunt" which means because the roads have been reinforced. This coin represents a military victory. The arch, also being symbolic of such an accomplishment. The coins that he issued showed that Augustus was a very political emperor. He wanted to make people aware of his accomplishments so he could get the approval and respect he deserved. The Holy star, in 1705 the English astronomer Edmond Halley published a work that included his calculations showing that comets observed in 1531, 1607, and 1682 were really one comet and predicting that comet's return in 1758. The comet was sighted late in 1758, passed perihelion in March 1759, and was named in Halley's honour. Comet sightings at intervals of about 76 years, from 63BC. Caesar Augustus Born: 23-Sep-63 before Caesar Augustus Decssus, Died: 19-Aug-14 AD. Passed by the Earth and Sun in November-December 1985 and March-April 1986.The earliest known mention of the comet in Europe occurs in Dion Cassius’s account of a number of portents at the death of Augustus Caesar which is where you get the Son of God ascending upon the throne of the God’s. His age is the same return as the comet 76 years born 63 work it out, then perverted by the cruz worshipers, “In 1682 he predicted the comet would return again in 1758, and sure enough, the comet arrived in March 1759. Halley's Comet made a particularly bright appearance in 1910.Augustus Caesar’s birth as in son of god 63, comet calculation taking his age at AD or Augustus Death age 76 away from 63, year he was born13,89,165,241,317,393,469,545,621,697,773,849,925,1001,1077,1153,1229,1305,1381,1457,1533,1609,1685,1761,1837,1913,1989 so as you can clearly see not much change or discrepancy in the dates of Edmund with the birth of the true son of god i.e. Augustus .It takes a wise man to lead the blind and the wicked to lead them away from the true guiding light.