One More
3) Despite all the Co2 emissions from manufacturing and breathing that man puts into the atmosphere each year, it is a scientific and provable fact that it represents only 3% of the total Co2, As of the last readings, it is scientific fact that Co2 is 0.0047% of our atmosphere. So, it is mathematical fact that man is responsible for about 0.000141% of the Co2. That means that if half of the earth's population were gone, half the cars, planes, trains and trucks removed, and half of all factories, power plants, homes and businesses were shut down, it is mathematical fact, that man produced carbon emissions would decrease by only 0.0007%. What fool would support such a destructive undertaking for so little effect?
Dwight
replied to: dkehoe2
Replied to: One More
3) Despite all the Co2 emissions from...
The thing is, we are dealing with a very finely balanced system. Small amounts of warming (so far we have only seen about 1C increase) can lead to more warming because of the many positive feedback mechanisms that amplify global warming such as ice albedo, water vapour, permafrost methane release etc.
We are really faced with a situation where we can cut back on our unsustainable lifestyle in a managed way, or risk having it forced upon us by the natural systems of the planet.
You feeling lucky?
You may want to read some of the books that talk about man's move into space. They describe just how unique and finely balanced our planet is.
replied to: DerekAndrews
Replied to: The thing is, we are dealing with a very finely balanced...
There are counties in several states, with less than 500 people, land owners in these counties keep control over countie Government, by using different means. Protecting the environment to control population groath, is one way demographs ,Endangered species is another way used to keep people from making a living off the land. Gridlock in Washington makes it impossible for the whole Country to emerge from the present economic slump. "Occupying the land" movement is a good way to help Washington break theBig business and Government control of the environmental movement has ruined the economy, and does very little good for the environment. This is because it allows the worse polluters to decide what is good and what is bad for the environment. There are hundreds of things that could be done other than Western bashing to solve the problem, Instead of dumping wast water into our rivers ,lakes our drinking water, every drop should be used to grow more trees Scientists have looked carefully at each of these factors. The only one where the data matches up is greenhouse gases -- levels of these gases have risen sharply as we burn more fossil fuels. If liberals were really interested in solving the problem, and not interested only in bashing industrialized nations, They would look for real solutions, The most logical solution is to increase oxygen in the atmosphere, rather than slow industrialization. One average size tree produces enough oxygen for breathing of 25 people. The average new home built would add 5 new trees to the world's best oxygen producers A simple solution in the US Is to force the US Government to release some of the millions an millions of acres, they are holding away from the people to control demographers for political reasons. GB advocates have already starved 100 millions Africans to death with their Western bashing agenda. Trees not only pump oxygen into the atmosphere they also pump moisture into the air. It doesn't rain much any more in Africa because most of the trees have been cut down in Africa and the Mid east. present gridlock..
replied to: DerekAndrews
Replied to: The thing is, we are dealing with a very finely balanced...
There are counties in several states, with less than 500 people, land owners in these counties keep control over countie Government, by using different means. Protecting the environment to control population groath, is one way demographs ,Endangered species is another way used to keep people from making a living off the land. Gridlock in Washington makes it impossible for the whole Country to emerge from the present economic slump. "Occupying the land" movement is a good way to help Washington break theBig business and Government control of the environmental movement has ruined the economy, and does very little good for the environment. This is because it allows the worse polluters to decide what is good and what is bad for the environment. There are hundreds of things that could be done other than Western bashing to solve the problem, Instead of dumping wast water into our rivers ,lakes our drinking water, every drop should be used to grow more trees Scientists have looked carefully at each of these factors. The only one where the data matches up is greenhouse gases -- levels of these gases have risen sharply as we burn more fossil fuels. If liberals were really interested in solving the problem, and not interested only in bashing industrialized nations, They would look for real solutions, The most logical solution is to increase oxygen in the atmosphere, rather than slow industrialization. One average size tree produces enough oxygen for breathing of 25 people. The average new home built would add 5 new trees to the world's best oxygen producers A simple solution in the US Is to force the US Government to release some of the millions an millions of acres, they are holding away from the people to control demographers for political reasons. GB advocates have already starved 100 millions Africans to death with their Western bashing agenda. Trees not only pump oxygen into the atmosphere they also pump moisture into the air. It doesn't rain much any more in Africa because most of the trees have been cut down in Africa and the Mid east. present gridlock..
replied to: dkehoe2
Replied to: One More
3) Despite all the Co2 emissions from...
I have come to the conclusion that we all have a little blame global warming and its consequences and guilt even more politicians who do not slow down.
http://www.globalwarmingweb.com/