String theory
Is there life on other planets
Posts  1 - 9  of  9
NASA
I think there is because in the world there is lots and lots of secrets yet to be uncovered. We might find out when the technology catches up...
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  NASA
Sciencefreak1127
Replied to:  I think there is because in the world there is lots...
Wait seven years
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  NASA
mvastano6164
Replied to:  I think there is because in the world there is lots...
Most evolutionary biologists would say no. The possibilities for life to begin from the proteins that chance offers is to vast to encrypt such an event from happening. You might want to check out Fred Hoyle's book on "The Intelligent Universe" to get a better idea on what it would mean for this type of thing to happen by chance.
Mike
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  Sciencefreak1127
Arka
Replied to:  Wait seven years
Everytime possible.We havent experienced the planets in even our nearest galaxy,so leave out chances about the universe!!
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  Arka
mvastano6164
Replied to:  Everytime possible.We havent experienced the planets in even our nearest galaxy,so...
Yes! It is such a vast universe! However, from what we know at this point in time we can postulate such events taking place elsewhere. We have to work with what we know so calling into question what we do not know will not allow science to move forward. Again from what we know is seems evident that the chances of what happened on our planet are too great to happen elsewhere never mind even here! Check out Ben Stein's movie " Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed" for such chance happenings. Otherwise spend some serious time reading available books like Fred Hoyle"s book on " The Intelligent Universe".
Here is an example of what you would encounter in Hoyle's book. An excerpt on what Hoyle said about what Darwinian chances concerning evolution as follows: "As for modern darwinism goes that would be "neo-Darwinism"or "new Darwinists". These Darwinist believe that mutations are entirely spontaneous accidents that happen inside organisms, that in addition nothing else except natural selection is required to explain the evolution of the whole of life. Is natural selection really the powerful idea it is popularly supposed to be? If among a number of varities of a species one is best fitted to survive in the environment as it happens to be, then it is the variety that is best fitted to survive that will best survive. Surely the rich assembly of plants and animals found on Earth cannot have been produced by a truism of this minor order? The spark plug of evolution must lie elsewhere. It lies in the source of the variations on which natural selection operates. Dawinians nowadays believe the ultimate source lies in chance miscopyings of genetic information. It is evident that in the fosslile record we have evolution in major leaps not the preferred pictures of Darwinians of natural selection as a daily and hourly scrutinizing the slightist variations. Just the opposite. Rather a adding of genes to existing organisms over a longer period of time as if wound up in a catapult and then let loose causing abrubt changes in species". Now I am not an evolutionary biologist. But something is amiss in Darwins understanding. My suggestion to read Fred Hoyel's book would give you some kind of idea about those questions you seem to be thinking about. Mike
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  NASA
museken
Replied to:  I think there is because in the world there is lots...
Yes there is life on other planets.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  mvastano6164
lehmann520
Replied to:  Yes! It is such a vast universe! However, from what...
Hey....Fred Hoyle....my hero...you too? NO WAY!
dude, we're like...RELATED!


LOL
Love,
Dawn
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  NASA
euieLC
Replied to:  I think there is because in the world there is lots...
It is more possible that life exists in other parts of the galaxy or even out of our own galaxy. Let's start with stars, they behave somewhat common with one another. They emit light which is the source of life here on earth, and that is what we've known life would start. But it is very possible that life could start without light.

How many stars do we have in our universe? How is it possible that every stars have planets revolving them?. If every star have planets revolving them and they are receiving enough light similar to the amount of light we are receiving from our sun, then most likely those planets will have similar environment like what we have here on earth.

How many stars do we have in our universe? If you can give a figure though just estimated like "millions" then you are able to give an answer to what is the probability that life exists outside our Earth.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  NASA
JameDula
Replied to:  I think there is because in the world there is lots...
There was no life in the other planets but earth only. Refer my article at "what killed the dinosaurs?" for more details on this matter.
Save
Cancel
Reply
 
x
OK