bravotren
Does MF Hussain deserve the title Picasso of India?
M F Husain
Posts 1 - 4 of 4
replied to: bravotren
galaxaura
Replied to: Does MF Hussain deserve the title Picasso of India?
Yes, he has been a long standing quality artist whose work deserves equal recognition
replied to: galaxaura
MonarchX
Replied to: Yes, he has been a long standing quality artist whose work...
He even shared the stage with Picasso two years before his death
replied to: bravotren
Hindu
Replied to: Does MF Hussain deserve the title Picasso of India?
NO.....
http://www.hindujagruti.org/activities/campaigns/national/mfhussain-campaign/
He always got inspired to paint India God Mother India, but he never painted nude his own mother or daughter.
Here are the reason why I dislike MF Hussain.
1.
Representing India as a woman being raped, is nothing but terrible denigration. For an Indian, ‘Bharat Mata’ (Mother India) is a Goddess and not some figurative concept and showcasing her in this manner is highly outrageous and a completely unacceptable form of denigration.
2.It would be appropriate to ask MF Husain if he would have dared to make a similar painting had there been an attack on the UK, the UAE or Qatar and named it the ‘Rape of UK, UAE or Qatar’ ? (Husain has recently become a citizen of Qatar)
3.What is MF Husain’s sick fascination for having sex with animals ? Why does he repeatedly superimpose his dirty minded eroticism on Deities ?
4.Why has he split the canvas in half ? Does he want to suggest that India will spilt ? Why this divisive implication that India will crumble under attack ?
5.Why has he painted the blood that has been spilt in the colour green ? And also the two bulls with green faces. The offenders of the cowardly terrorist attacks that India is facing, are the people who are symbolized by the colour green, and not the other way around. Does he expect the Islamisation of India ?
6.India has been wounded by innumerable terrorist attacks. Instead of expressing her pain, MF Husain has humiliated her and has added insult to her injury by showing her being raped and that too with the perverted suggestion of an animal straddling her and of a man pulling at her blouse and staring at her breast.
7.If MF Husain is truly an artist (as claimed by the artist community) and that all his thoughts about being outraged by terrorism were genuine, then why does he not paint others being nude and having sex with animals ? But as we have observed he depicts only India and Hindus in this manner.
8.Thus, for these reasons this painting is unacceptable to an Indian and it hurts and rapes our sensibilities.
http://www.hindujagruti.org/activities/campaigns/national/mfhussain-campaign/
He always got inspired to paint India God Mother India, but he never painted nude his own mother or daughter.
Here are the reason why I dislike MF Hussain.
1.
Representing India as a woman being raped, is nothing but terrible denigration. For an Indian, ‘Bharat Mata’ (Mother India) is a Goddess and not some figurative concept and showcasing her in this manner is highly outrageous and a completely unacceptable form of denigration.
2.It would be appropriate to ask MF Husain if he would have dared to make a similar painting had there been an attack on the UK, the UAE or Qatar and named it the ‘Rape of UK, UAE or Qatar’ ? (Husain has recently become a citizen of Qatar)
3.What is MF Husain’s sick fascination for having sex with animals ? Why does he repeatedly superimpose his dirty minded eroticism on Deities ?
4.Why has he split the canvas in half ? Does he want to suggest that India will spilt ? Why this divisive implication that India will crumble under attack ?
5.Why has he painted the blood that has been spilt in the colour green ? And also the two bulls with green faces. The offenders of the cowardly terrorist attacks that India is facing, are the people who are symbolized by the colour green, and not the other way around. Does he expect the Islamisation of India ?
6.India has been wounded by innumerable terrorist attacks. Instead of expressing her pain, MF Husain has humiliated her and has added insult to her injury by showing her being raped and that too with the perverted suggestion of an animal straddling her and of a man pulling at her blouse and staring at her breast.
7.If MF Husain is truly an artist (as claimed by the artist community) and that all his thoughts about being outraged by terrorism were genuine, then why does he not paint others being nude and having sex with animals ? But as we have observed he depicts only India and Hindus in this manner.
8.Thus, for these reasons this painting is unacceptable to an Indian and it hurts and rapes our sensibilities.